Abstract
Cahill et. al. published a large review of the use of BMP in spinal fusions. They reviewed the nationwide inpatient database, which represents approximately 25% of use U.S. Community Hospitals from the years 2002 to 2006. This included over 300,000 fusion type procedures. They noted increased complications with the use of anterior cervical procedures specifically increased complications with increased dysphasia and wound complications.
Due to these concerns, the Food and Drug Administration released last year a public health notification about the potential life threatening complications related to the use of BMP in anterior cervical spine fusions. Joseph & Rampersaud noticed a 20% incidence of heterotopic ossification in patients undergoing this procedure versus only 8% for patients who had undergone fusions without BMP.
Wong et. al. published a report on five cases of neurologic injury that relate to the use of BMP and the formation of heterotopic bone. Again, the suggestion of a barrier or closure defect was brought up and this may help minimise the risks; however, further work is noted. Multiple authors have noted a phenomenon of osteolysis occurring around graft fusion sites for the use of BMP. McCullen et. al. evaluated that 32 levels in 26 patients who had undergone a TLIF procedure. It is unclear the carcinogenic and tetraogenic effects of the use of BMP in the spine and also, the effects of repeat exposures on BMP has yet to be addressed. Finally, the long term cost and benefits of the use of BMP on the health care system has yet to be fully addressed.
So in conclusion, BMP2 is effective in producing fusions especially in challenging environments, deformity, smoking and infection. However, the complications continue to be a concern especially with regards to interbody fusions as well as in the cervical spine.
