header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

Foot & Ankle

AN AUDIT OF 1088 ANKLE TRAUMA PATIENTS: A DESCRIPTIVE ANALYSIS OF PICK UP RATES AND UNWARRANTED RADIOGRAPHS

British Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (BOFAS)



Abstract

Introduction

Ottawa ankle rules originally described in 1992 have been shown to improve the pick-up rates of ankle fractures and avoid the need for unnecessary X-rays, thus minimising cost and radiation to the patient.

We decided to carry out an audit at our hospital to look at the pick-up rates of ankle fractures and ways to minimise x-rays for the patient both in A&E and in the orthopaedic department.

Methods

Ankle x-rays of 1088 trauma patients over a 7 month period from Dec 2009 to June 2010 (inclusive) were reviewed. Patients with ankle fractures were classified according to Weber type, and whether they were treated surgically or non-operatively. Non-operatively treated ankle fractures then formed the main sub-group of our study, looking at the number of follow-up X-rays and the amount of subsequent displacement. The amount of displacement was classified into non-displaced (0 mm), minimally displaced (<2mm) and displaced (>2 mm).

Results

171 patients (out of 1088) were found to have fractured their ankle giving a pick up rate of 16%. (cf a pickup rate of 26% described in literature with implementation of Ottawa rules). The pick up rate fluctuated each month from 31% in December to a meagre 6% fractures in June and this could be due to summertime sports injuries causing less fractures and more sprains. We noted a third more x-rays were ordered in Spring than Winter. There were no changes in junior staff in either the A&E or the orthopaedic department to account for the monthly variations.

Conservatively managed fractures were followed up in the fracture clinic (n = 95, 56%) 16% (n = 11) of the conservatively managed patients were classified as Weber A fractures 84% (n=58) as Weber B fractures. No Weber C fractures were conservatively managed. Of the eleven Weber A fractures only one was minimally displaced. Conservatively managed Weber A fractures received an average of 1.36 x-rays on follow up in the Orthopaedic department. Of the Weber B fractures 42 were non-displaced whilst 16 were minimally displaced, and these received an average of 3.23 x-rays on follow up. None of these progressed to displacement > 2mm.

Conclusion

Based on our audit, we have introduced a policy to limit the number of follow-up of X-rays for minimally displaced and undisplaced Weber A & B fractures to one. We have also re-emphasized the importance of Ottawa rule implementation in our A&E department