header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

Foot & Ankle

PROSPECTIVE RANDOMISED CONTROL TRIAL COMPARING THE EFFICACY OF EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCKWAVE THERAPY AGAINST PHYSIOTHERAPY FOR NON INSERTIONAL TENDOACHILLIS TENDONITIS

British Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (BOFAS)



Abstract

ECSWT has been on the medical horizon for last 30 years mainly in urology for urolithiasis and has found a parallel use in orthopaedics for various chronic soft tissue conditions like Tendoachilles tendinoses and plantar fasciitis etc. ECSWT acts a piezoelectric device releasing acoustic energy and causing micro-trauma activating cytokine mediated response stimulating local angiogenesis and tissue repair.

Methodology

56 patients were recruited for the trial after ethics approval was achieved. The diagnosis was confirmed with ultrasound scan and measuring the width of the swelling and the local hypervascularity. The cohort of the patients was randomised in groups for physiotherapy [n=23] and shockwave therapy [n= 23]. The patient groups with shockwave therapy received a 3-week treatment with typical 2000 impulses per session once a week and physiotherapy group was subjected to eccentric loading exercises. Patients were assessed at 12 week with AOFAS, VISA-A scores and repeat ultrasound scan.

Results

The average age of the average age was 51 years [36- 73 years] Mean duration of symptoms prior to treatment was 25 months (range 6-60 months). AOFAS scores increased in both groups: from 64□86 in the ECSWT group and 72□79 in the physiotherapy group. VISA-A scores also increased in both groups from 39□73 in the ECSWT group and from 36□56 in the physiotherapy group. Scores were significantly higher in the ECWST group post treatment. The ultrasound scan findings suggested the tendon girth receding from 10.9 mm□9.9 mm in physiotherapy group while 9.8 mm□8.7 mm in the ECSWT group with hypervascularity decreasing from marked to mild in both groups. Statistical significance was established using SPSS 16 p < 0.001in post treatment group.

Conclusion

Clinically significant improvement was found in the patients treated with ECSWT as compared to the physiotherapy sessions while radiological evidence showed parallel improvement in both the groups.