header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

General Orthopaedics

IMAGE BASED GUIDANCE INCREASES ACCURACY FOR K-WIRE PLACEMENT

The International Society for Computer Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery (CAOS)



Abstract

Fractures of the femoral head are a challenging problem. The most often performed head preserving procedure worldwide is closed reduction and insertion of cannulated screws under fluoroscopic control. The use of navigation is still experimental in general trauma since rigid reference markers must be attached to all fragments. The examined system (Surgix®, Tel Aviv, Israel) is a fluoroscopy based image analysing system. It consists of a workstation and X-ray opaque markers in surgical tools. When the tool is visible in a C-arm shot a trajectory is displayed as additional layer in the image to serve as guidance for the surgeon.

Forty synthetic femurs (Synbone®, Malans, Switzerland) were used and placed inside foam to simulate the soft tissue of the thigh. The models were equipped with 4.5mm radio-opaque markers at the fovea capitis femoris as target point. The aim was to bring the tip of a K-wire as close as possible to the target point entering the bone at the lateral base of the greater trochanter in a center-center position. Twenty were done under image guidance and 20 were operated the conventional way. Outcome measures included the accuracy (the distance between the tip of the wire and the target in a CT), the number of guide wire insertions, procedure duration, radiation exposure and learning curve.

In the image guided group optimal guide wire placement was accomplished on first pass in 65% of the cases as compared to 5% in the conventional group (p = < 0.0001). The average number of trial and error was significantly lower in the guided group (1.7 vs. 5.8, p = < 0.0001). Consequently the average duration of the guided procedure was significantly shorter (p = 0.0008) along with radiation exposure time reduced by over 70% (p = 0.0002). The guidance system hit averaged 5.8 mm off target as compared to 5.3 mm for the freehand method (p = 0.3319).

Image based guidance significantly shortened the procedure, reduced the radiation exposure and the number of trials without changing the surgeons workflow and can be used in trauma cases were reference marker based navigation is not applicable.