Abstract
There is limited literature regarding the outcome of hip and knee arthroplasty (THR and TKR) in the Super-Elderly (≥80yrs). The aim is to compare the outcome of THR and TKR in the Super-Elderly with a standard-age cohort of patients. From January 2006 to August 2008; 1290 TKR and 1344 THR were performed at the study institute. Comorbidity, length of stay, patient satisfaction, Oxford knee or hip scores, and SF12 scores were recorded prospectively. The Oxford Score and SF12 were recorded at one year. The mode age range was 65-74yrs for TKR (n=492) and THR (n=495), deemed the standard cohort. 185 TKR and 171 THR were performed in the Super-Elderly. Outcome in this cohort was compared to the standard.
The standard cohort had a greater absolute improvement in Oxford knee scores (15.8 and 14.7.p=0.2). Improvement of absolute Oxford hip scores revealed no difference (20.0 and 20.2.p=0.8), but the Super-Elderly had a greater improvement in pain components (11.0 vs.12.0.p=0.05) with a lesser improvement of the functional components (9.0.vs.8.2.p=0.05). There was a greater improvement in the physical component of the SF-12 score in the standard cohort for both TKR and THR (10.6.vs.7.9.p=0.05 and 14.4.vs.10.4.p=<0.01, respectively).
No significant difference was seen in comorbidities, but the Super-Elderly patients had a longer hospital stay for TKR (6.2.vs.8.3.p=0.01) and THR (5.9.vs.9.0.p=0.01).
The Super-Elderly were more satisfied with their surgery (p=0.05).
Super-Elderly patients have comparable outcomes to their younger counterparts and are more satisfied with their surgery, but they may require a longer length of stay.
