Abstract
Introduction
The trochlear groove plays a major role in the mechanics and patho-mechanics of the patellofemoral joint. Our primary goal was to compare normal, osteoarthritic and dysplastic PFJs in terms of angles and distances.
Method
Computed tomography scans of 40 normal knees (>55 years old), 9 knees with patellofemoral osteoarthritis (group A) and 12 knees with trochlear dysplasia (group B) were analysed using 3D software. The femurs were orientated using a robust frame of reference. A circle was fitted to the trochlear groove. The novel trochlear axis was defined as a line joining the centres of two spheres fitted to the trochlear surfaces, lateral and medial to the trochlear groove. The relationship between the femoral trochlea and the tibiofemoral joint was measured in term of angles and distances (offsets).T-test for paired samples was used (p<0.05).
Results
The normal trochlear groove closely matched a circle (RMS 0.3mm). It was positioned laterally in relation to the mechanical, anatomical, and trans-condylar axes of the femur. It was not co-planar with any of the three axes. After aligning to the new trochlear axis, the trochlear groove appeared more linear than when other axes were used. In comparison to the normal knees; the medial trochlear was smaller in group A (p=0.0003). The lateral trochlear was smaller in group B (p=0.04). The trochlear groove was smaller in groups B (p=0.0003). Both trochlear centres in groups A+B were more centralised (p=0.00002-0.03). The medial trochlear centre was more distal in group A (p=0.03) and the lateral trochlear centre was more distal in group B (p=0.00009). The trochlear groove started more distal in group B (p=0.0007).
Discussion
In osteoarthritic and dysplastic patellofemoral joints, the trochlea is both smaller and more distally located in relation to the tibiofemoral joint. These two factors may contribute to excessive loads that lead to early joint wear.
