header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

General Orthopaedics

SECONDARY RECONSTRUCTION OF DISPLACED THREE AND FOUR-PART PROXIMAL HUMERAL FRACTURES WITH LOCKING PLATE SYSTEM

British Orthopaedic Association (BOA) 2006



Abstract

Introduction

Symptomatic neglected and displaced three- and four-part proximal humeral fractures are often difficult to reconstruct. Replacement has been reported to give poor functional outcome and hence is not the ideal treatment option. We report our results of secondary reconstruction of these difficult fractures with a locking plate system.

Material and methods

Between 2003 and 2005, 15 healthy active patients with displaced three- to four-part fractures underwent revision/secondary open reduction and internal fixation with a locking plate system (Philos, Stratec UK Ltd). Ten patients had delayed presentation. Three patients had failed previous internal fixation. One patient had non-union and one had malunited fracture. Their average age was 63 years. Objective assessment was measured by the Constant score, subjective assessment by the Oxford questionnaire. The mean follow-up was 14 months.

Surgical technique

In revision cases, the fracture was approached through the same incision. All metal work was removed. Careful attention was given to restore the normal anatomy of the humeral head with correct placement of the tuberosities. Reduction was held with Ticron sutures through the rotator cuff followed by fixation with the locking plate. Two patients required arthroscopic repair of their labral tears. The shoulder was immobilised in a sling for four weeks followed by a gradual mobilisation programme.

Results

All fractures united. No failure of fixation was observed. The mean Constant score was 73. The pain component improved from 3 pre-operatively to 14 at follow-up. The average range of flexion was 1100, abduction of 950 and external rotation of 350. All patients had good to excellent subjective outcome. We encountered poor rotator cuff function in one patient.

Conclusion

Successful reconstruction of three- and four-part proximal humeral fractrures is possible. Anatomical restoration of humeral head and tuberosities prior to plate fixation is essential for good outcome.