Abstract
Aim
The aim of this study was to compare the results of humerus intramedullary nail (IMN) and dynamic compression plate (DCP) for the management of diaphyseal fractures of humerus.
Material & methods
47 patients with diaphyseal fracture of shaft humerus were randomised prospectively and treated by open reduction and internal fixation with IMN or DCP. The criteria for inclusion were Grade 1.2a compound fractures; Polytrauma; Early failure of conservative treatment; Unstable fracture.
Patients with pathological fracture, Grade 3 open fracture, refracture or old neglected fracture of humerus were excluded from the study. 23 patients underwent internal fixation by IMN and 24 by DCP. Reamed antegrade nailing was done in all cases. DCP was done through an anterolateral or posterior approach.
Results
The outcome was assessed in terms of union time, union rate, functional outcome and incidence of complications. Functional outcome was assessed using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score (ASES). On comparing the results by independent samples t test, there was no significant difference in ASES score between the two groups. The average union time was found to be significantly lower for IMN compared to DCP(P<.05). The union rate was found to be similar in both the groups. Complications like infection were found to be higher with DCP compared to IMN, while shortening of the arm (1.5-4cm) and restriction of shoulder movements due to impingement of the nail were found to be higher with DCP compared with IMN. However, this improved in all patients following removal of the nail once the fracture healed.
Conclusion
This study proves that IMN can be considerd as a better surgical option for these fractures as it offers shorter union time and less incidence of serious complications like infection. However, there appears to be no difference between two groups in union rate and functional outcome.
