Abstract
Aim
The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of the Magnetic Resonance Imaging with that of Stress views of the ankle in testing the integrity of the lateral ankle ligaments. Arthroscopic diagnosis was used as the gold standard.
Methods
This was a prospective study involving 45 patients who had previous trauma to the ankle and reported symptoms of ankle instability. Our patients were recreational athletes or military patients. These patients had MRI evaluation prior to arthroscopic evaluation and treatment of the ankle. The diagnosis regarding the integrity of the Calcaneofibular ligament (CFL) and the Anterior Talo-fibular ligament (ATFL), as obtained from the MRI was compared against the assessment of integrity from the stress views. These were compared against the assessment made by direct visualisation of the ligaments during arthroscopy. The sensitivity, specificity, negative (NPV) and positive predictive values (PPV) and accuracy were then calculated.
Results
The sensitivity and specificity of the MRI and the stress views were poor for diagnosis of ATFL tears. However, the stress views had better sensitivity (93.7%) and specificity (96.5%), for the CFL, as compared with those of the Magnetic Resonance scans (sensitivity 50% and specificity of 86.2%). There was a difference between the diagnostic accuracy of the two methods of investigation with respect to integrity of the CFL but not of that of the ATFL. The PPV and the NPV for the ATFL was comparable using the MRI and the stress radiographs, the stress radiographs had a better predictive values for the calcaneo-fibular ligament, PPV of 93.7% and NPV of 96.5%.
Conclusion
The results of this study suggest that routine pre-operative Magnetic Resonance Imaging is not beneficial or cost effective in diagnosing lateral ligament.
