Abstract
Aims
Hip fracture is a common injury in the elderly. Recent studies in orthopaedic access have demonstrated inequities affecting Māori. This study aimed to compare the demographic differences between Māori and NZ Europeans with hip fractures, identify any deficiencies in initial, surgical and post op care and in outcomes.
Methods
All cases in New Zealand from 2018–2020 were included. Key outcomes included time to theatre from admission, change in walking status, residential status and survival at 120 days post fracture.
Univariate analysis compared differences in demographics, surgical and management factors between ethnicities. Key outcome comparisons were conducted using multivariate analysis to assess whether ethnicity was an independent risk factor for outcomes.
Results
Data from 9432 patients were analysed. 305 patients were Māori (3.2%). Māori were younger at presentation (76.2 vs 83.2 yrs, p<0.001), used less walking aids (50 vs 56%, p=0.034), were more medically comorbid and more likely to have impaired cognition (42% vs 37%, p=0.022).
There were no differences in fracture types, surgical management strategy, and nerve block utilisation between ethnicities. No perioperative management differences were found. Māori had a longer delay to theatre (39 vs 35hrs, p=0.007), and were less likely to be prescribed bone protection on discharge (64% vs 71%, p=0.011). Once adjusted location and ASA, difference in time to theatre was not statistically significantly.
Overall mortality was 13.1% at 120 days. 45% had a reduction in walking ability while 15% required increase level of care. Multivariate analysis found no differences were found between ethnicities for mortality, change in residential or walking status.
Discussion
While younger at presentation, Māori are more co-morbid and may live in DHBs with worse theatre access, contributing to a longer time to theatre. Improving access to tertiary care and overall health of older Māori will likely improve outcomes.
