Abstract
Introduction
Knee dislocations, vascular injuries and floating knee injuries can be initially managed by a external fixator. Fixator design constructs include the AO pattern and the Diamond pattern. However, these traditional constructs do not adhere to basic principles of external fixation. The Manchester pattern knee-spanning external fixator is a new construct pattern, which uses beam loading and multiplanar fixation. There is no data on any construct pattern. This study compares the stability of these designs.
Materials & Methods
Hoffman III (Stryker, USA) external fixation constructs were applied to articulated models of the lower limb, spanning the knee with a diamond pattern and a Manchester pattern. The stiffness was loaded both statically and cyclically with a Bose 3510 Electroforce mechanical testing jig (TA Instruments). A ramp to load test was performed initially and cyclical loading for measurement of stiffness over the test period. The results were analysed with a paired t-test and ANOVA.
Results
The mean stiffness with the diamond pattern fixator was significantly less stiff than the Manchester pattern fixator – by a factor of 3 (40N/mm vs 115N/mm). Displacement increased in all patterns over simulated loading equating to six weeks. The diamond pattern demonstrated a 50%% increase in displacement over time. The Manchester pattern demonstrated only 20% increase in displacement over time. These are all statistically significant (p<0.01)
Conclusions
The aim of an external fixator in knee dislocations and vascular injuries is to provide stability, prevent displacement and protect repairs. Vascular injuries often require fixation for several weeks to protect a repair. The Manchester pattern, applying the principles of external fixation, provides a stiffer construct and also confers greater stability over the time a fixator may be required. We commend this more informed design for the management of knee dislocations and vascular injuries.
