header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

Research

TREATMENT AFFECTS LOAD-TO-FAILURE AND MICRODAMAGE ACCUMULATION IN HEALTHY AND OSTEOLYTIC RAT VERTEBRAE

The International Combined Orthopaedic Research Societies (ICORS), World Congress of Orthopaedic Research, Edinburgh, Scotland, 7–9 September 2022. Part 1 of 3.



Abstract

Bone turnover and microdamage are impacted by skeletal metastases which can contribute to increased fracture risk. Treatments for metastatic disease may further impact bone quality. This study aimed to establish an understanding of microdamage accumulation and load to failure in healthy and osteolytic vertebrae following cancer treatment (stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), zoledronic acid (ZA), or docetaxel (DTX)).

Forty-two 6-week old athymic female rats (Hsd:RH-Foxn1rnu, Envigo) were studied; 22 were inoculated with HeLa cervical cancer cells through intracardiac injection (day 0). Animals were randomly assigned to four groups: untreated (healthy=5, osteolytic=6), SBRT on day 14 (healthy=6, osteolytic=6), ZA on day 7 (healthy=4, osteolytic=5), and DTX on day 14 (healthy=5, osteolytic=5). Animals were euthanized on day 21. L1-L3 motion segments were compression loaded to failure and force-displacement data recorded. T13 vertebrae were stained with BaSO4 and µCT imaged (90kVp, 44uA, 4.9µm) to visualize microdamage location and volume. Damage volume fraction (DV/BV) was calculated as the ratio of BaSO4 to bone volume. Differences in mean load-to-failure were compared using three-way ANOVA (disease status, treatment, cells injected). Differences in mean DV/BV between treatment groups were compared using one-way ANOVA.

Treatment had a significant effect on load-to-failure (p=0.004) with ZA strengthening the healthy and osteolytic vertebrae. Reduced strength post SBRT seen in the metastatic (but not the healthy) group may be explained by greater tumor involvement secondary to higher cell injection concentrations. Untreated metastatic samples had higher DV/BV (16.25±2.54%) compared to all treatment groups (p<0.05) suggesting a benefit of treatment to bone quality.

Focal and systemic cancer treatments were shown to effect load-to-failure and microdamage accumulation in healthy and osteolytic vertebrae. Developing a better understanding of how treatments effect bone quality and mechanical stability is critical for effective management of patients with spinal metastases.


Email: