header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

Research

DYNAMICS OF M1 MACROPHAGES IN THE INDUCED MEMBRANE: MASQUELET TECHNIQUE

The International Combined Orthopaedic Research Societies (ICORS), World Congress of Orthopaedic Research, Edinburgh, Scotland, 7–9 September 2022. Part 1 of 3.



Abstract

Recent researches indicate that both M1 and M2 macrophages play vital roles in tissue repair and foreign body reaction processes. In this study, we investigated the dynamics of M1 macrophages in the induced membrane using a mouse femur critical-sized bone defect model.

The Masquelet method (M) and control (C) groups were established using C57BL/6J male mice (n=24). A 3mm-bone defect was created in the right femoral diaphysis followed by a Kirschner wire fixation, and a cement spacer was inserted into the defect in group M. In group C, the bone defect was left uninserted. Tissues around the defect were harvested at 1, 2, 4, and 6 weeks after surgery (n=3 in each group at each time point). Following Hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining, immunohistochemical staining (IHC) was used to evaluate the CD68 expression as a marker of M1 macrophage. Iron staining was performed additionally to distinguish them from hemosiderin-phagocytosed macrophages.

In group M, HE staining revealed a hematoma-like structure, and CD68-positive cells were observed between the spacer and fibroblast layer at 1 week. The number of CD68-positive cells decreased at 2 weeks, while they were observed around the new bone at 4 and 6 weeks. In group C, fibroblast infiltration and fewer CD68-positive cells were observed in the bone defect without hematoma-like structure until 2 weeks, and no CD68-positive cells were observed at 4 and 6 weeks. Iron staining showed hemosiderin deposition in the surrounding area of the new bone in both groups at 4 and 6 weeks. The location of hemosiderin deposition was different from that of macrophage aggregation.

This study suggests that M1 macrophage aggregation is involved in the formation of induced membranes and osteogenesis and may be facilitated by the presence of spacers.


Email: