header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

Research

BIOMECHANICS OF FACET JOINTS: SYNCHRONIZED SPATIO-TEMPORAL AND MECHANICAL ANALYSIS

The British Orthopaedic Research Society (BORS) 2023 Meeting, Cambridge, England, 25–26 September 2023.



Abstract

Abstract

Objectives

While spinal fusion is known to be associated with adjacent disc degeneration, little is known on the role of the facet joints in the process, and whether their altered biomechanics following fusion plays a role in further spinal degeneration. This work aimed to develop a model and method to sequentially measure the effects of spinal fusion on lumbar facet joints through synchronisation of both motion analysis, pressure mapping and mechanical analysis.

Methods

Parallel measurements of mature ovine lumbar facet joints (∼8yr old, n=3) were carried out using synchronised load and displacement measurements, motion capture during loading and pressure mapping of the joint spaces during loading. Functional units were prepared and cemented in PMMA endcaps. Displacement-controlled compression measurements were carried out using a materials testing machine (3365, Instron, USA) at 1 mm/min up to 950 N with the samples in a neutral position, while motion capture of the facet joints during compression was carried out using orthogonal HD webcams (Logitech, Switzerland) to measure the displacement of key facet joint features. The pressure mapping of load transfer during displacement was carried out using a flexible pressure sensor (6900 series, Tekscan, USA). Each sample was imaged at an isotropic resolution of 82 microns using a μCT scanner (XtremeCT, Scanco, Switzerland) to quantify the curvature within the facet joints.

Results

Relative facet joint displacement under load, in a neutral position, showed more displacement (2.36 ±1.68 mm) compared to the cross-head when under compression (2.06 ±1.19 mm). Motion capture indicated the relative displacement of the facet joints was more posterior with some lateral motion. For five of the six facet joints, pressure measurement was possible only on 24±7 % of the surface due to the large change in curvature. Partially measured loads through the facets was 10.5 ±1.1 N.

Conclusions

The relative displacement of the lumbar facet joints compared to the crosshead displacement was consistent with previous studies of cervical facet joints, despite the differences in anatomical geometry between cervical and lumbar joints. The difficulties in accurately measuring the load transfer through the facet joints was due to the age of the tissue and the degree of curvature of the facet joints. Synchronisation of the biomechanical data will provide a setup to assess the effect of interventions such as spinal fusion, with curvature-related issues unlikely to occur in human spines.

Declaration of Interest

(a) fully declare any financial or other potential conflict of interest