Abstract
Introduction
Osteotomy is a key step in distraction osteogenesis. Various techniques of osteotomy have been described with its own benefits and pitfalls. Percutaneous osteotomy using multiple drill holes is one of the most widely used osteotomy techniques. It still remains a challenge however to keep the drill holes aligned prior to the osteotomy. Moreover, the efficacy of percutaneous irrigation practice to keep the temperature low during drilling with this technique is also debatable. With an aim to overcome these challenges, we are introducing a device called the Double Barrel Drill Sleeve (DBDS) to perform percutaneous osteotomies. We attempted to compare this method to the conventional multiple drill holes technique using laboratory experiments and clinical data.
Materials & Methods
DBDS has two adjacent parallel barrels that can fit 3.2 to 3.5 mm diameter drill bits. It has a guide member at the drilling end that can be inserted through a pre drilled hole at the near and far cortices of a bone. This provides a constant rotating point for drilling of holes through the barrels. An osteotomy simulation was performed to compare percutaneous drilling with DBDS vis-a-vis a conventional single drill sleeve (SDS) by qualified orthopaedic surgeons, mainly to assess the drilling patterns of both techniques. Percutaneous drilling was done on PVC pipes wrapped in thick sponge to simulate tubular bone with surrounding soft tissue. We also assessed the effect of indirect irrigation on temperature during drilling using the DBDS against a control group on a cadaveric bone model. Ultimately we reviewed our patients who had undergone osteotomy for distraction osteogenesis with DBDS and the conventional technique, and compared their outcomes.
Results
Completion time for the osteotomy simulation in the DBDS group was significantly faster than the conventional drilling group; 74 seconds to 179 seconds. There was significantly less drilling deviation from the midpoint in the DBDS group as compared to the SDS group. Mean bone temperature during drilling with indirect irrigation using DBDS was significantly lower (32.6'C) compared to the control group (48.4'C). There was no significant difference in healing index between patients treated with DBDS and the conventional method. None of these patients developed non union.
Conclusions
Percutaneous drilling with DBDS was quicker and more linear compared to the conventional method. Its double-barreled feature allows effective indirect irrigation during drilling. A comparable healing index in both of the techniques shows its clinical efficacy. These attributes make DBDS a usefull tool to overcome some of the pitfalls associated with the conventional multiple drill holes technique.
