Abstract
Menisci are crucial structures for knee homeostasis: they provide increase of congruence between the articular surfaces of the distal femur and tibial plateau, bear loading, shock absorption, lubrication, and proprioception. After a meniscal lesion, the golden rule, now, is to save as much meniscus as possible: only the meniscus tissue which is identified as unrepairable should be excised and meniscal sutures find more and more indications. Several different methods have been proposed to improve meniscal healing. They include very basic techniques, such as needling, abrasion, trephination and gluing, or more complex methods, such as synovial flaps, meniscal wrapping, or the application of fibrin clots. Basic research of meniscal substitutes has also become very active in the last decades. The features needed for a meniscal scaffold are: promotion of cell migration, it should be biomimetic and biocompatible, it should resist forces applied and transmitted by the knee, it should slowly biodegrade and should be easy to handle and implant. Several materials have been tested, that can be divided into synthetic and biological. The first have the advantage to be manufactured with the desired shapes and sizes and with precise porosity dimension and biomechanical characteristics. To date, the most common polymers are polylactic acid (PGA); poly-(L)-lactic acid (PLLA); poly- (lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA); polyurethane (PU); polyester carbon and polycaprolactone (PCL). The possible complications, more common in synthetic than natural polymers are poor cell adhesion and the possibility of developing a foreign body reaction or aseptic inflammation, leading to alter the joint architecture and consequently to worsen the functional outcomes. The biological materials that have been used over time are the periosteal tissue, the perichondrium, the small intestine submucosa (SIS), acellular porcine meniscal tissue, bacterial cellulose. Although these have a very high biocompatibility, some components are not suitable for tissue engineering as their conformation and mechanical properties cannot be modified. Collagen or proteoglycans are excellent candidates for meniscal engineering, as they maintain a high biocompatibility, they allow for the modification of the porosity texture and size and the adaptation to the patient meniscus shape. On the other hand, they have poor biomechanical characteristics and a more rapid degradation rate, compared to others, which could interfere with the complete replacement by the host tissue. An interesting alternative is represented by hydrogel scaffolds. Their semi-liquid nature allows for the generation of scaffolds with very precise geometries obtained from diagnostic images (i.e. MRI).
Promising results have been reported with alginate and polyvinyl alcohol (PVA). Furthermore, hydrogel scaffolds can be enriched with growth factors, platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate (BMAC). In recent years, several researchers have developed meniscal scaffolds combining different biomaterials, to optimize the mechanical and biological characteristics of each polymer. For example, biological polymers such as chitosan, collagen and gelatin allow for excellent cellular interactions, on the contrary synthetic polymers guarantee better biomechanical properties and greater reliability in the degradation time. Three-dimensional (3D) printing is a very interesting method for meniscus repair because it allows for a patient-specific customization of the scaffolds. The optimal scaffold should be characterized by many biophysical and biochemical properties as well as bioactivity to ensure an ECM-like microenvironment for cell survival and differentiation and restoration of the anatomical and mechanical properties of the native meniscus. The new technological advances in recent years, such as 3D bioprinting and mesenchymal stem cells management will probably lead to an acceleration in the design, development, and validation of new and effective meniscal substitutes.
