Abstract
Dual plate constructs have become an increasingly common fixation technique for midshaft clavicle fractures and typically involve the use of mini-fragment plates. The goal of this technique is to reduce plate prominence and implant irritation, as these are common reasons for revision surgery. However, limited biomechanical data exist for these lower-profile constructs. The study aim was to compare dual mini-fragment orthogonal plating to traditional small-fragment clavicle plates for biomechanical non-inferiority and to determine if an optimal plate configuration could be identified, using a cadaveric model.
Twenty-four cadaveric clavicles were randomized to one of six groups (n=4 per group), stratified by CT-based bone mineral content (BMC). The six different plating configurations compared were: pre-contoured superior or anterior fixation using a single 3.5-mm LC-DC plate, and four different dual-plating constructs utilizing 2.4-mm and 2.7-mm reconstruction or LC-DC plates. The clavicles were plated and then osteotomized to create an inferior butterfly fracture, which was then fixed with a single interfragmentary screw (OTA 15.2B). Axial, torsional, and bending (anterior and superior surface loading) stiffness were determined for each construct through non-destructive cyclic testing, using an MTS 858 Bionix materials testing system. This was followed by a load-to-failure test in three-point superior-surface bending. Kruskal-Wallace H and Mann-Whitney U were used to test for statistical significance.
There were no significant differences in BMC (median 7.9 g, range 4.2-13.8 g) for the six groups (p=1.000). For axial stiffness, the two dual-plate constructs with a superior 2.4-mm and anterior 2.7-mm plate (either reconstruction or LC-DC) were significantly stiffer than the other four constructs (p=0.021). For both superior and anterior bending, the superior 2.4-mm and anterior 2.7-mm plate constructs were significantly stiffer when compared to the 3.5-mm superior plate (p=0.043). In addition, a 3.5-mm plate placed anterior was a stiffer construct than a superior 3.5-mm plate (p=0.043). No significant differences were found in torsional stiffness or load-to-failure between the different constructs.
Dual plating using mini-fragment plates is biomechanically superior for fixation of midshaft clavicle fractures when compared to a single superior 3.5-mm plate and has similar biomechanical properties to a 3.5-mm plate placed anteriorly. With the exception of axial stiffness, no significant differences were found when different dual plating constructs were compared to each other. However, placing a 2.4-mm plate superiorly in combination with a 2.7-mm plate anteriorly might be the optimal construct, given the biomechanical superiority over the 3.5-mm plate placed superior.
