Abstract
Meniscal tears are the most common knee injuries, occurring in acute ruptures or in chronic degenerative conditions. Meniscectomy and meniscal repair are two surgical treatment options. Meniscectomy is easier, faster, and the patient can return to their normal activities earlier. However, this procedure has long-term consequences in the development of degenerative changes in the knee, potentially leading to knee replacement. On the other hand, meniscal repair can offer prolonged benefits to the patients, but it is difficult to perform and requires longer rehabilitation.
Sutures are used for meniscal repairs, but they have limitations. They induce tissue damage when passing through the meniscus. Furthermore, under dynamic loading of the knee, they can cause tissue shearing and potentially lead to meniscal repair failure.
Our team has developed a new technology of resistant adhesive hydrogels to coat the suture used to repair meniscal tissue.
The objective of this study is to biomechanically compare two suture types on bovine menisci specimens: 1) pristine sutures and 2) gel adhesive puncture sealing (GAPS) sutures, on a repaired radial tear under cyclic tensile testing.
Five bovine knees were dissected to retrieve the menisci. On the 10 menisci, a complete radial tear was performed. They were separated in two groups and repaired using either pristine (2-0 Vicryl) or GAPS (2-0 Vicryl coated with adhesive hydrogels) with a single stitch and five knots.
The repaired menisci were clamped on an Instron machine. The specimens were cyclically preconditioned between one and 10 newtons for 10 cycles and then cyclically loaded for 500 cycles between five and 25 newtons at a frequency of 0.16 Hz. The gap formed between the edges of the tear after 500 cycles was then measured using an electronic measurement device. The suture loop before and after testing was also measured to ensure that there was no suture elongation or loosening of the knot.
The groups were compared statistically using Mann-Whitney tests for nonparametric data. The level of significance was set to 0.05.
The mean gap formation of the pristine sutures was 5.61 mm (SD = 2.097) after 500 cycles of tensile testing and 2.38 mm (SD = 0.176) for the GAPS sutures. Comparing both groups, the gap formed with the coated sutures was significantly smaller (p = 0.009) than with pristine sutures. The length of the loop was equal before and after loading. Further investigation of tissue damage indicated that the gap was formed by suture filament cutting into the meniscal tissue.
The long-term objective of this research is to design a meniscal repair toolbox from which the surgeon can adapt his procedure for each meniscal tear. This preliminary experimentation on bovine menisci is promising because the new GAPS sutures seem to keep the edges of the meniscal tear together better than pristine sutures, with hopes of a clinical correlation with enhanced meniscal healing.
