Abstract
Despite the current trend favoring surgical treatment of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures (DIACFs), studies have not been able to demonstrate superior functional outcomes when compared to non-operative treatment. These fractures are notoriously difficult to reduce. Studies investigating surgical fixation often lack information about the quality of reduction even though it may play an important role in the success of this procedure. We wanted to establish if, amongst surgically treated DIACF, an anatomic reduction led to improved functional outcomes at 12 months.
From July 2011 to December 2020, at a level I trauma center, 84 patients with an isolated DIACF scheduled for surgical fixation with plate and screws using a lateral extensile approach were enrolled in this prospective cohort study and followed over a 12-month period. Post-operative computed tomography (CT) imaging of bilateral feet was obtained to assess surgical reduction using a combination of pre-determined parameters: Böhler's angle, calcaneal height, congruence and articular step-off of the posterior facet and calcaneocuboid (CC) joint. Reduction was judged anatomic when Böhler's angle and calcaneal height were within 20% of the contralateral foot while the posterior facet and CC joint had to be congruent with a step-off less than 2 mm. Several functional scores related to foot and ankle pathology were used to evaluate functional outcomes (American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score - AOFAS, Lower Extremity Functional Score - LEFS, Olerud and Molander Ankle Score - OMAS, Calcaneal Functional Scoring System - CFSS, Visual Analog Scale for pain - VAS) and were compared between anatomic and nonanatomic DIAFCs using Student's t-test. Demographic data and information about injury severity were collected for each patient.
Among the 84 enrolled patients, 6 were excluded while 11 were lost to follow-up. Thirty-nine patients had a nonanatomic reduction while 35 patients had an anatomic reduction (47%). Baseline characteristics were similar in both groups. When we compared the injury severity as defined by the Sanders’ Classification, we did not find a significant difference. In other words, the nonanatomic group did not have a greater proportion of complex fractures. Anatomically reduced DIACFs showed significantly superior results at 12 months for all but one scoring system (mean difference at 12 months: AOFAS 3.97, p = 0.12; LEFS 7.46, p = 0.003; OMAS 13.6, p = 0.002, CFSS 7.5, p = 0.037; VAS −1.53, p = 0.005). Univariate analyses did not show that smoking status, worker's compensation or body mass index were associated with functional outcomes. Moreover, fracture severity could not predict functional outcomes at 12 months
This study showed superior functional outcomes in patients with a DIACF when an anatomic reduction is achieved regardless of the injury severity.
