header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

General Orthopaedics

USE OF TANTALUM ACETABULAR CUPS IN PRIMARY TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY: CURRENT CONCEPT AND A REVIEW OF THE CURRENT LITERATURE

The British Indian Orthopaedic Society (BIOS) Annual Scientific Meeting, Mansfield, England, 7–8 July 2022.



Abstract

Abstract

Background

Although tantalum is a well recognised implant material used for revision arthroplasty, little is known regarding the use of the same in primary total hip arthroplasty.

Methods

A literature search was performed to find all relevant clinical studies until March 2020, which then underwent a further selection criteria. The inclusion criteria was set as follows: Reporting on human patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty; Direct comparison between tantalum acetabular cups with conventional acetabular cups

for use in primary total hip arthroplasty; Radiological evaluation (cup migration, osteointegration); Clinical (functional scores, need for subsequent revision, patient-reported outcomes; Post-operative complications; Reporting findings in the English Language. After a thorough search a total of six studies were included in the review. The primary outcome

measures were clinical outcomes, implant migration, change in bone mineral density and rate of revision and infection.

Results

Tantalum was found superior to titanium with regards to fewer radiolucencies, survivorship, osteointegration, decreased osteolysis and mechanical loosening. No significant difference in radioisometric analysis, bone mineral density or Harris Hip Score was found. Revision and infection rates were found to be significantly lower in tantalum group at 10 years from pooled data of national joint registry.

Conclusion

The use of tantalum can be reserved for cases of high risk of failure or mechanical loosening, where failure of a contralateral joint occurred as it carries lower risk of failure and infection. Further studies with longer follow-up would be useful in drawing further conclusions.