Abstract
Abstract
Background
Distinction between foot and ankle wound healing complications as opposed to infection is crucial for appropriate allocation of antibiotic therapy. Our aim was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of white cell count (WCC) and C-reactive protein (CRP) as diagnostic tools for this distinction in the non-diabetic cohort.
Methods
Data were reviewed from a prospectively maintained Infectious Diseases Unit database of 216 patients admitted at Leicester University Hospitals – United Kingdom between July 2014 and February 2020 (68 months). All diabetic patients were excluded. For the infected non-diabetic included patients, we retrospectively retrieved the inflammatory markers (WCCs and CRP) at the time of presentation. Values of CRP 0–10 mg/L and WCC 4.0–11.0 ×109 /L were considered normal.
Results
25 patients met our inclusion criteria. Infections were confirmed microbiologically with positive intra-operative culture results. 7 (28%) patients with foot osteomyelitis (OM), 11 (44%) with ankle OM, 5 (20%) with ankle septic arthritis, and 2 (8%) patients with post-surgical wound infection were identified. Previous bony surgery was identified in 13 (52%) patients. 21 (84%) patients did have raised inflammatory markers while 4 (16%) patients failed to mount an inflammatory response even with subsequent debridement and removal of metalwork. CRP sensitivity was 84%, while WCC sensitivity was only 28%.
Conclusion
CRP had good sensitivity, whereas WCC is a poor inflammatory marker in the detection of such cases. In presence of a clinically high level of suspicion of foot or ankle infection, a normal CRP should not rule out the diagnosis of OM.
