header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

General Orthopaedics

MUSCLE-ONLY VERSUS CHIMERIC MUSCULOCUTANEOUS GASTROCNEMIUS FLAP IN COMPLEX ORTHOPLASTIC RECONSTRUCTION AROUND THE KNEE: A RETROSPECTIVE MULTICENTRE OUTCOME STUDY

The European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS) Meeting, Graz, Austria, 8–10 September 2022.



Abstract

Aim

In the context of total knee arthroplasty (TKA), trauma with perigenicular fracture fixation or oncological surgical treatment, soft tissue defects can expose critical structures such as the extensor apparatus, the knee joint, bone or implants. This work compares soft tissue reconstruction (STR) between a classical pedicled gastrocnemius (GC) muscle flap and a pedicled chimeric sural artery perforator (SAP) musculocutaneous GC flap in complex orthoplastic scenarios.

Method

A retrospective study was conducted on prospectively maintained databases in three University Hospitals from January 2016 to February 2021 after orthopaedic, traumatological or oncological treatment. All patients with a perigenicular soft tissue defect and implant-associated infection were included undergoing STR either with a pedicled GC flap or with a pedicled chimeric SAP-GC flap. The outcome analysis included successful STR and flap related complications. The surgical timing, preoperative planning and surgical technique are discussed together with the postoperative rehabilitation protocol.

Results

43 patients were included (22 GC muscle flaps, 21 SAP-GC musculocutaneous flaps). The GC and SAP-GC patient group were comparable in terms of age, comorbidities, defect size and follow-up. The incidence of flap related complications was comparable among the two groups. Specifically, in the SAP-GC group 1 wound dehiscence at the recipient site occurred as well as 1 distal muscle flap necrosis, 1 distal skin flap necrosis, 1 donor site infection and 1 donor site wound dehiscence. Furthermore, the donor site was closed in 9 patients while a skin graft was used in 12 patients. A significant difference was recorded with regard to re-raising the flap for further orthopaedic treatment: In the SAP-CG group (re-raise in 11 patients) no problems occurred while in the GC group (re-raise in 14 patients) in 6 patients the soft tissue did not heal completely.

Conclusions

According to our clinical experience, the pedicled chimeric SAP-CG musculocutaneous flap is a relevant further development of the classical GC workhorse flap for perigenicular STR, in multiple staged procedures.


E-Mail: