Abstract
Aim
In the current study we aim to characterize the use of cationic host defense peptides (HDPs) as alternative antibacterial agents to include into novel antibacterial coatings for orthopedic implants.
Staphyloccous aureus represent one the most challenging cause of infections to treat by traditional antibacterial therapies. Thanks to their lack of microbial resistance described so far, HDPs represent an attractive therapeutic alternative to antibiotics. Furthermore, HDPs have been showed to control infections via a dual function: direct antimicrobial activity and regulation of immune response. However, HDPs functions characterization and comparison is controversial, as changing test conditions or cell type used might yield different effects from the same peptide. Therefore, before moving towards the development of HDP-based coatings, we need to characterize and compare the immunomodulatory and antibacterial functions under the same conditions in vitro of 3 well-known cathelicidins: human LL-37, chicken CATH-2, and bovine-derived IDR-1018.
Method
S. aureus, strain SH1000, was incubated with different concentrations of each HDP and bacterial growth was monitored overnight. Primary human monocytes were isolated from buffy coats using Ficoll-Paque density and CD14 microbeads, and differentiated for 7 days to macrophages. After 24h incubation in presence of LPS and HDPs, macrophages cytokines production was measured by ELISA. Macrophages cultured for 24h in presence of HDPs were infected with serum-opsonized S. aureus. 30 min and 24h after infection, bacterial phagocytosis and intracellular killing by macrophages were measured by flow cytometry and colony forming units (CFU) count respectively.
Results
All HDPs efficiently inhibit macrophages LPS-mediated activation, as observed by a reduced production of TNF-α and IL-10. Despite a comparable anti-inflammatory action, only CATH-2 shows direct antibacterial properties at concentrations 10-times lower than those needed to stimulate immune cells. Although stimulation with HDPs fails to improve macrophages ability to kill intracellular S. aureus, IDR-1018 decreases the proportion of cells phagocytosing bacteria.
Conclusions
In addition to a strong anti-inflammatory effect provided by all HDPs tested, CATH-2 has direct antibacterial effects while IDR-1018 reduces the proportion of macrophages infected by S. aureus. Use of these HDPs in combination with each other or with other conventional antibacterial agents could lead the way to the design of novel antibacterial coatings for orthopedic implants.
