Abstract
Aim
The rise of multidrug-resistant bacteria and the decreasing efficacy of antibiotic therapy in successfully treating biofilm-associated infections are prompting the exploration of alternative treatment options. This study investigates the efficacy of different bioactive glass (BAG) formulations - alone or combined with vancomycin - to eradicate biofilm. Further, we study the influence of BAG on pH and osmotic pressure as important factors limiting bacterial growth.
Method
Different BAG-S53P4 formulations were used for this study, including (a) BAG-powder (<45 μm), (b) BAG-granules (500–800 μm), (c) a cone-shaped BAG-scaffold and (d) two kinds of BAG-putty containing granules, with no powder (putty-A) or with additional powder (putty-B), and a synthetic binder. Inert glass beads were included as control. All formulations were tested in a concentration of 1750 g/ml in Müller-Hinton-Broth. Targeted bacteria included methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and epidermidis (MRSE). Vancomycin was tested at the minimum-inhibitory-concentration for each strain (1 µg/ml for MRSA; 2 μg/ml for MRSE).
To investigate the antibiofilm effect of BAG alone or combined with vancomycin, 3 hour-old MRSA or MRSE biofilms were formed on porous glass beads and exposed to BAG ± vancomycin for 24h, 72h and 168h. After co-incubation, biofilm-beads were deep-washed in phosphate-buffered saline and placed in glass vials containing fresh medium. Recovering biofilm bacteria were detected by measuring growth-related heat production at 37°C for 24h by isothermal microcalorimetry.
Changes in pH and osmotic pressure over time were assessed after co-incubation of each BAG formulation in Müller-Hinton-Broth for 0h, 24h, 72h and 168h.
Results
All BAG formulations showed antibiofilm activity against MRSA and MRSE in a time-dependent manner, where longer incubation times revealed higher antibiofilm activity. BAG-powder and BAG-putty-B were the most effective formulations suppressing biofilm, followed by BAG-granules, BAG-scaffold and finally BAG-putty-A. The addition of vancomycin had no substantial impact on biofilm suppression.
An increase in pH and osmotic pressure over time could be observed for all BAG formulations. BAG-powder reached the highest pH value of 12.5, whereas BAG-putty-A resulted in the lowest pH of 9. Both BAG-putty formulations displayed the greatest increase on osmotic pressure.
Conclusions
BAG-S53P4 has demonstrated efficient biofilm suppression against MRSA and MRSE, especially in powder-containing formulations. Our data indicates no additional antibiofilm improvement with addition of vancomycin. Moreover, high pH appears to have a larger antimicrobial impact than high osmolarity.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by PRO-IMPLANT Foundation (Berlin, Germany). The tested materials were provided by Bonalive Biomaterials Ltd (Turku, Finland).
