header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

General Orthopaedics

TIBIAL BONE AND SOFT-TISSUE CONCENTRATIONS FOLLOWING COMBINATION THERAPY WITH VANCOMYCIN AND MEROPENEM: EVALUATED BY MICRODIALYSIS IN A PORCINE MODEL. SHOULD PATIENTS WITH OPEN FRACTURES HAVE HIGHER DOSES OF ANTIBIOTICS?

The European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS) Meeting, Graz, Austria, 8–10 September 2022.



Abstract

Aim

Prompt and sufficient broad spectrum empirical antibiotic treatment is key to prevent infection following open tibial fractures. Succeeding co-administration, we dynamically assessed the time for which vancomycin and meropenem concentrations were above relevant epidemiological cut-off minimal inhibitory concentrations (T>MIC) in tibial compartments for the bacteria most frequently encountered in open fractures. Low and high MIC-targets were applied: 1 and 4 µg/mL for vancomycin and 0.125 and 2 µg/mL for meropenem.

Materials and methods

8 pigs received a single dose of 1000 mg vancomycin and 1000 mg meropenem simultaneously over 100 min and 10 min, respectively. Microdialysis catheters were placed for sampling over 8 h in tibial cancellous bone, cortical bone, and adjacent subcutaneous adipose tissue. Venous blood samples were collected as references.

Results

Across the targeted epidemiological cut-off values, vancomycin displayed longer T>MIC in all the investigated compartments in comparison to meropenem. For both drugs, cortical bone exhibited the shortest T>MIC. For the low MIC targets and across compartments, T>MIC ranged between 208–499 min (46–100%) for vancomycin and 189–406 min (42–90%) for meropenem. For the high MIC targets, T>MIC ranged between 30–446 min (7–99%) for vancomycin and 45–181 min (10–40%) for meropenem.

Conclusion

The differences in the T>MIC between the low and high targets illustrates how the interpretation of these results is highly susceptible to the defined MIC target. To encompass any trauma, contaminating or individual tissue differences, a more aggressive dosing approach may be considered to achieve longer T>MIC in all the exposed tissues and thereby lowering the risk of acquiring an infection after open tibial fractures.


E-mail: