header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

General Orthopaedics

FINITE ELEMENT MODELLING OF TIBIAL DEFECTS MANAGED WITH A FINE WIRE FIXATOR

The British Limb Reconstruction Society (BLRS) 2021 Annual Scientific Meeting, Virtual Conference, held online, 15 April 2021.



Abstract

Introduction

Circular frame fixation has become a cornerstone of non-union and deformity management since its inception in the 1950s. As a consequence of modularity and heterogenous patient and injury factors, the prediction of the mechanobiological environment within a defect is subject to wide variations in practice. Given these wide range of confounding variables, clinical and cadaveric experimentation is close to impossible and frame constructs are based upon clinician experience. The Finite Element Analysis (FEA) method provides a powerful tool to numerically analyse mechanics. This work aims to develop an FEA model of a tibial defect and predict the mechanical response within the construct.

Materials and Methods

The geometry of a tibia was acquired via CT and a series of bone defects were digitally created in the tibial diaphysis. A 4-ring, 10-wire Ilizarov fixator was constructed using 180mm stainless steel rings and 1.8mm stainless steel wires tensioned to 1200N. An axial load (800N) was applied to simulate single leg stance of an 80kg patient. The magnitude of displacement was measured for defects with varying sizes (5–40mm). A numerical analysis was performed in large-strain regime using open-source FEA library (MoFEM).

Results

Defect size did not effect displacement, but significantly influenced strain. Measured displacements were 5.72–5.78mm, however strain ranged from 14.5–100%. Moreover, it was found that bone material properties also have no significant impact on the results.

Conclusions

Accounting for FEA assumptions, this model predicted a strain environment which was above expected favourable range for bone healing. The addition of graft within the environment is likely to change the mechanobiological environment which warrants further investigation. We plan to develop this model to answer further research questions in the limb reconstruction discipline and validate its accuracy with mechanical data. We believe the presented approach can be a useful tool for investigating the performance circular frames.