Abstract
Driven by increasing emphasis on problem-based and self-directed learning, medical students and doctors in orthopedic specialty training rely increasingly on the internet as learning resource. As students or residents performance on physical examination may be less supervised in comparison to other clinical skills (for example surgical competence), online videos may provide a valuable source for education of physical examination skills. Cognitive psychological research has shown that videos can help viewers to understand techniques and manage the sequential steps of physical examination and approach to patients. YouTube is the largest open-access video platform available and provides access to thousands of educational videos on orthopedics-related topics. VuMedi, G9MD, and Orthobullets are examples of online platforms requiring user-registration with video content that is more directly focused on orthopedic topics. The objective of this study was to investigate the accuracy and quality of instructional videos on the physical examination of the elbow and identify factors influencing the educational usefulness.
A YouTube, VuMedi, Orthobullets, and G9MD search was performed on October 7, 2018 for videos on the physical examination of the elbow. We included both basic examination and disease specific tests. The included videos were rated for accuracy and quality by two independent authors using a modified version of a validated scoring system. Inter-rater reliability was analyzed using mean difference and intra-class correlation coefficient.
Twenty-three out of 126 videos were indicated as useful for educational purposes. Accuracy, quality and total scores were statistically significant higher for videos from specialized platforms compared to YouTube: 16.5 (95% CI 16 to 17) vs. 12.816 (95% CI 12.3 to 13.3) respectively. Video accuracy and quality were highly variable and did not correlate. The number of days online, views, and likes showed no or weak correlation with accuracy and quality. For the total score, our assessment tool showed excellent inter-rater reliability of 0.93 (95% CI 0.09–0.95) and a mean difference of 0.024 point between the two observers (p=0.871).
There is considerable variation in accuracy and quality of online available videos on the physical examination of the elbow. We indicated 23 educationally useful videos and provided an assessment method. This assessment method can be useful for both viewers to assess reliability of a video and educators interested in creating videos.
