Abstract
Hip arthroscopy rates continue to increase. As a result, there is growing interest in capsular management techniques. Without careful preservation and surgical techniques, failure of the repair result in capsular deficiency, contributing to iatrogenic instability and persistent post-operative pain. In this setting, capsular reconstruction may be indicated, however there is a paucity of objective evidence comparing surgical techniques to identify the optimal method. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical effect of capsulectomy and two different capsular reconstruction techniques (iliotibial band [ITB] autograft and Achilles tendon allograft) on hip joint kinematics in both rotation and abduction/adduction.
Eight paired fresh-frozen hemi-pelvises were dissected of all overlying soft tissue, with the exception of the hip joint capsule. The femur was potted and attached to a load cell connected to a joint-motion simulator, while the pelvis was secured to a custom-designed fixture allowing adjustment of the flexion-extension arc. Optotrak markers were rigidly attached to the femur and pelvis to track motion of the femoral head with respect to the acetabulum. Pairs were divided into ITB or Achilles capsular reconstruction. After specimen preparation, three conditions were tested: (1) intact, (2) after capsulectomy, and (3) capsular reconstruction (ITB or Achilles). All conditions were tested in 0°, 45°, and 90° of flexion. Internal rotation (IR) and external rotation (ER) as well abduction (ABD) and adduction (ADD) moments of 3 N·m were applied to the femur via the load cell at each position. Rotational range of motion and joint kinematics were recorded.
When a rotational force was applied the total magnitude of internal/external rotation was significantly affected by the condition of the capsule, independent of the type of reconstruction that was performed (p=0.001). The internal/external rotation increased significantly by approximately 8° following the capsulectomy (p<0.001) and this was not resolved by either of the reconstructions; there remained a significant difference between the intact and reconstruction conditions (p=0.035). The total anterior/posterior translation was significantly affected by the condition of the capsule (p=0.034). There was a significant increase from 6.7 (6.0) mm when the capsule was intact to 9.0 (6.7) mm following the capsulectomy (p=0.002). Both of the reconstructions (8.6 [5.6] mm) reduced the anterior/posterior translation closer to the intact state. There was no difference between the two reconstructions. When an abduction/adduction force was applied there was a significant increase in the medial-lateral translation between the intact and capsulectomy states (p=0.047).
Across all three flexion angles the integrity of the native hip capsule played a significant role in rotational stability, where capsulectomy significantly increased rotational ROM. Hip capsule reconstruction did not restore rotational stability and also increased rotational ROM compared to the intact state a statistically significant amount. However, hip capsule reconstruction restored coronal and sagittal plane stability to approach that of the native hip. There was no difference in stability between ITB and Achilles reconstructions across all testing conditions.
