Abstract
Abstract
Background
Recruitment of patients to participate in Randomised control trials (RCTs) is a challenging task, especially for trauma trials in which the identification and recruitment are time-limited. Multiple strategies have been tried to improve the participation of doctors and recruitment of patients.
Aim
To study the effect of a trainee advocate (trainee Principal investigator-tPI) on influencing junior doctors to take part in trials and its effect on recruitment for a multicenter prospective hip fracture RCT.
Methods
A retrospective study comparing the number of junior doctors participating in trials and patients recruited before and after the introduction of informal tPI role at UHW Cardiff.
Results
The target recruitment set by the central trial unit was 9/month. Excluding the research team, there were 6 trainees actively recruiting in the before period (Feb’19-July’19) in comparison with 12 in the after period (Sept’19-Feb’20). TPI had a direct influence on 9 of the 11 trainees to get involved in the trials by guidance and nudging. There were 105 eligible patients of which 62 were recruited (59% of eligible pts, 115% of target) in the before period in comparison with 102 recruited (76% of eligible pts, 189% of target) out of the 135 eligible patients in the after period. The proportion of recruitment done by the research team to that of trainees was 79%:21% in the before period in comparison with 30%:70% in the after period further improving to 15%:85% in the last 3 months.
Conclusion
TPI can work alongside the PI and research team to be a valuable link person coordinating and engaging local trainees to take part in trials. This may be particularly beneficial in hospitals where there is no dedicated research team. TPI role could be formalized for many trials and can be used as a leadership & management potential building experience for trainees.
Declaration of Interest
(b) declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported:I declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research project.
