Abstract
Abstract
Introduction
Ankle arthritis is estimated to affect approximately 72 million people worldwide. Treatment options include fusion and total ankle replacement (TAR). Clinical performance of TAR is not as successful as other joint replacement and failure is poorly understood. Finite element analysis offers a method to assess the strain in bone implanted with a TAR. Higher strain has been associated with microfracture and alters the bone-implant interface. The aim of this study was to explore the influence of implant fixation on strain within the tibia when implanted with a TAR through subject-specific models.
Methods
Five cadaveric ankles were scanned using a Scanco Xtreme CT. The Tibia and Talus were segmented from each scan and virtually implanted with a Zenith TAR (Corin, UK) according to published surgical technique. Patient specific models were created and run at five different positions of the gait cycle corresponding to peak load and flexion values identified from literature. Bone material properties were derived from CT greyscale values and all parts were meshed with linear tetrahedral elements. The implant-bone interface was adjusted to fully-fixed or frictionless contact, representing different levels of fixation post-surgery. Strain distributions around the tibial bone fixation were measured.
Results
Initial results showed clear differences in strain distributions both between different ankle specimens and fixation levels, with highest strain occurring within the bone at the tip of the tibial stem. Frictionless contact gave higher strain outputs than fully-fixed for all specimens with a range 0.12–0.3% and 0.07%–0.13% respectively.
Conclusions
In all specimens, strain was higher in the frictionless contact, which may be considered representative of no bony ingrowth, highlighting fixation may be a critical factor in TAR failure. Differences observed between specimens highlights that TAR may not be a suitable intervention for all patients, due to variation in bone quality and anatomy.
Declaration of Interest
(b) declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported:I declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research project.
