Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
Hip joint laxity after total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been considered to cause microseparation and lead to complications, including wear and dislocation. In the native hip, the hip capsular ligaments may tighten at the limits of range of hip motion and provide a passive stabilising force preventing edge loading and reduce the risk of dislocation. Previous attempts to characterise mechanical properties of hip capsular ligaments have been largely variable and there are no cadaveric studies quantifying the force contributions of each ligament in different hip positions. In this study we quantify the passive force contribution of the hip capsular ligaments throughout a complete range of motion (ROM).
Methods
Nine human cadaveric hip specimens (6 males and 3 females) with mean age of (76.4 ± 9.0 years) were skeletonised, preserving the capsular ligaments. Prepared specimens were tested in a 6 degree of freedom system to assess ROM with 5 Nm torque applied in external and internal rotation throughout hip flexion and extension. Capsular ligaments were resected in a stepwise fashion to assess internal force contributions of the iliofemoral (superior and inferior), pubofemoral, and ischiofemoral ligaments during ROM.
Results
In external rotation, the superior and inferior iliofemoral ligament minimum force contributions were (136.52 ± 27.15 N) in flexion and (82.40 ± 27.85 N) in extension, respectively. In internal rotation, the ischiofemoral ligament force contributions were dominant in adducted-flexion positions and abducted-extension positions.
Conclusions
These findings provide insights into the primary capsular structures that stabilise the hip joint in different manoeuvres. This data allows for an improved understanding of which capsular ligaments contribute the most to hip stability and has important implications for choosing surgical approaches and repair strategies to minimise complications related to joint instability.
Declaration of Interest
(b) declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported:I declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research project.
