Abstract
Abstract
OBJECTIVES
Abnormal joint mechanics have been proposed as adversely affecting natural hip joint tribology, whereby increased stress on the articular cartilage from abnormal loading leads to joint degeneration. The aim of this project was to assess the damage caused by different loading conditions on the articular surfaces of the porcine hip joint in an experimental simulator.
METHODS
Porcine hip joints were dissected and mounted in a single station hip simulator (SimSol, UK) and tested under loading scenarios (that corresponded to equivalent of different body mass index's’ (BMI) in humans), as follows:“Normal” (n=4), the loading cycle consisted of a simplified gait cycle based on a scaled version of a simplified twin-peak human gait cycle, the peak load was 900N (representative of a healthy BMI). Representative of an “Overweight” BMI (n=3), as the normal cycle with a peak load of 1,130N Representative of an “Obese” BMI (n=1), as the normal cycle with a peak load of 1,340N Tests were conducted at 1Hz for 14,400 cycles in Ringers solution; photogrammetry was used to characterise the appearance of the cartilage and labrum pre, during and post simulation. the appearance and location of damage was recorded.
RESULTS
No significant damage was observed for samples tested under normal conditions. Following “overweight” condition testing, tears and detachment of the labrum were observed during testing in two (of three) samples. In addition to damaged observed in “overweight” tested samples the “obese” showed similar damage and also cartilage bruising and wear tracks on the articular surface of the acetabulum.
DISCUSSION
The absence of damage in “normal” loading provides evidence that this is an appropriate methodology and loading regime for porcine hips. Increased damage with increasing loads demonstrates the potential to develop further this experimental simulation to assess adverse loading in natural hip joints.
Declaration of Interest
(b) declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported:I declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research project.
