header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

Research

ADDITIVELY MANUFACTURED TI6AL4V AND SS316L STOCHASTIC STRUCTURES WITH IMPROVED STIFFNESS ISOTROPY FOR BIOMATERIAL APPLICATIONS

The British Orthopaedic Research Society (BORS) Annual Meeting 2020, held online, 7–8 September 2020.



Abstract

Abstract

Objectives

Additive manufacturing (AM) enables fine control over the architecture of porous lattice structures, and the resulting mechanical performance. Orthopaedic implants may benefit from the tailored stiffness/elastic modulus of these AM biomaterials, as the stiffness can be made to closer match the properties of the replaced trabecular bone.

Methods

This study used laser powder bed fusion (PBF) to create stochastic porous lattice structures in stainless steel (SS316L) and titanium alloy (Ti6Al4V), with modifications that aimed to overcome PBF manufacturing limitations of build angles. The structures were tested in uni-axial compression (n = 5) in 10 load orientations relative to the structure, including the three orthogonal axes.

Results

The testing verified that no hidden peaks in elastic modulus existed in the stochastic structure. The standard deviation of the 10 elastic modulus values in the final structure decreased from 249 MPa to 101 MPa when made in SS316L and from 95.9 MPa to 52.5 MPa for Ti6Al4V, indicating the structures were more isotropic.

Conclusions

These modified stochastic lattices have similar stiffness to cancellous bone and have controllable anisotropy, giving them the potential to be used within implants which match the stiffness of trabecular bone.

Declaration of Interest

(b) declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported:I declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research project.