header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

Research

SPATIOTEMPORAL EFFECTS OF MECHANICAL LOADING AND PARATHYROID HORMONE TREATMENTS ON MOUSE TIBIAL MODEL OF OSTEOPOROSIS

The British Orthopaedic Research Society (BORS) Annual Meeting 2021, held online, 13–14 September 2021.



Abstract

Abstract

Objectives

Current therapies for osteoporosis are limited to generalised antiresorptive or anabolic interventions, which do not target specific regions to improve skeletal health. Moreover, the adaptive changes of separate and combined pharmacological and biomechanical treatments in the ovariectomised (OVX) mouse tibia has not been studied yet. Therefore, this study combines micro- computed tomography (micro-CT) imaging and computational modelling to evaluate the efficacies of treatments in reducing bone loss.

Methodology

In vivo micro-CT (10.4µm/voxel) images of the right tibiae of N=18 female OVX C57BL/6 mice were acquired at weeks 14, 16, 18, 20 and 22 of age for 3 groups: mechanical loading (ML), parathyroid hormone (PTH) or combined therapies (PTHML). All mice received either injection of PTH (100μg/kg/day, 5days/week) or vehicle from week 18. The right tibiae were mechanically loaded in vivo at week 19 and 21 with a 12N peak load, 40 cycles/day and 3 days/week. Bone adaptation was quantified through spatial changes in bone mineral density (BMD) and strain distribution was obtained from micro-CT-based finite element models.

Results

Densitometric parameters improved for all treatment between week 18–20 (10–21%), with the strongest benefits due to loading in the proximal regions (16–35%). At week 22, PTHML treatment induced 23–76% higher bone apposition in the proximal tibia than either monotherapy. Compared to the OVX control, all treatments reduced periosteal resorption at weeks 18–20 and 20–22 (20–87%). However, resorption in weeks 20–22 were 29–55% higher than weeks 18–20, increasing the strain in the proximal tibia. Synergistic effects of PTH and ML were observed on the periosteal surface of proximal tibia, but additive effects were seen predominately on the distal and lateral tibia.

Conclusions

ML had a more dominant effect in improving bone health. PTH enhances bone's osteogenic response to ML additively and synergistically in a site- and time-dependent manner.