Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
Stem malalignment in total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been associated with poor long-term outcomes and increased complications (e.g. periprosthetic femoral fractures). Our understanding of the biomechanical impact of stem alignment in cemented and uncemented THA is still limited. This study aimed to investigate the effect of stem fixation method, stem positioning, and compromised bone stock in THA.
Methods
Validated FE models of cemented (C-stem – stainless steel) and uncemented (Corail – titanium) THA were developed to match corresponding experimental model datasets; concordance correlation agreement of 0.78 & 0.88 for cemented & uncemented respectively. Comparison of the aforementioned stems was carried out reflecting decisions made in the current clinical practice. FE models of the implant positioned in varus, valgus, and neutral alignment were then developed and altered to represent five different bone defects according to the Paprosky classification (Type I – Type IIIb). Strain was measured on the femur at 0mm (B1), 40mm (B2), and 80mm (B3) from the lesser trochanter.
Results
Cemented constructs had lower strain on the implant neck, and higher overall stiffness and strain on bone compared to uncemented THA. Strain on the bone increased further down the shaft of the femoral diaphysis, and with progressing bone defect severity in all stem alignment cases. Highest strain on the femur was found at B2 in all stem alignment and bone defect models. Varus alignment showed higher overall femoral strain in both fixation methods. Interestingly, in uncemented models, highest strain was shown on femoral bone proximally (B1-B2) in varus alignment, but distally (B3) in neutral alignment.
Conclusion
Varus stem alignment showed overall higher strain on femur compared to neutral and valgus. This highlights the crucial role of stem alignment in long term outcomes of THA. Differences between the two stem types should be taken in consideration when interpreting results from this study.
