header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

Research

CHRONIC ACHILLES RUPTURE MANAGEMENT: A SCOPING REVIEW

The British Orthopaedic Research Society (BORS) Annual Meeting 2021, held online, 13–14 September 2021.



Abstract

Abstract

Objectives

Achilles tendon ruptures are common in the UK, with data demonstrating a significant rise in incidence over the past years. Chronic Achilles ruptures have been less well defined in literature, and repair techniques vary significantly. A surge in publications reporting various management options for chronic Achilles ruptures has necessitated a review that systematically maps and summarises current evidence regarding treatments and identifies areas for future research. This scoping review aims to improve knowledge of various treatment strategies and their associated outcomes, thereby aiding clinicians in optimising treatment protocols.

Methods

The Arksey and O'Malley, Levac and Peters frameworks were used. A computer-based search in PubMed, Embase, Emcare, Cinahl, ISI Web of Science and Scopus was performed for articles reporting the treatment of chronic Achilles ruptures. Two reviewers independently performed title/abstract and full text screening according to a pre-defined selection criteria.

Results

A total of 747 articles were identified, of which 73 were finally included. Various management strategies were described with flexor hallucis longus tendon transfer being the most common. The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score was the most commonly reported outcome, but 16 other measures were described within the literatures. All studies comparing pre- and post-operative outcomes reported a significant improvement. 50 studies reported complications, with an overall pooled complication rate of 168/1065 (15.8%).

Conclusions

Beneficial results were reported following various techniques, but comparison between these was challenging due to the low-level study designs used and confounding factors including treatment delay and tendon gap size. Further research exploring the efficacy of different techniques is required to facilitate the development of evidenced-based treatment protocols. Such a work would allow for clinicians to better understand the suitability of specific techniques, thereby selecting the optimal management strategy for each individual patient.