header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

Research

LACK OF STANDARDIZATION IN MECHANICAL TESTING OF PATELLAR TENDON

The British Orthopaedic Research Society (BORS) Annual Meeting 2021, held online, 13–14 September 2021.



Abstract

Abstract

Objectives

The patella tendon (PT) is commonly used as a graft material for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). The function of the graft is to restore the mechanical behaviour of the knee joint. Therefore, it is essential that a robust methodology be developed for the mechanical testing of the PT, as well as for the tissue engineered grafts derived from this tissue. Our objectives were to (1) survey the literature, in order to define the state-of-the-art in mechanical testing of the PT, highlighting the most commonly used testing protocols, and (2) conduct validation studies using porcine PT to compare the mechanical measurements obtained using different methodological approaches.

Methods

A PubMed search was performed using a boolean search term to identify publications consisting of PT tensile testing, and limited to records published in the past ten years (2010–2020). This returned a total of 143 publications. A meta-analysis was undertaken to quantify the frequency of commonly used protocol variations (pre-conditioning regime, strain rates, maximum strain, etc.). Validation studies were performed on porcine PT (n=4) using Instron tensile testing apparatus to examine the effect of preconditioning on low-strain (toe-region) mechanical properties.

Results

Ramp-to-failure testing was found to be most commonly performed (included in over 90 % of publications), followed by stress relaxation and cyclic testing (∼25 %). Preconditioning was most commonly cyclic (27 %), involving 10–100 cycles. Validation studies show the number of cycles and duration of preconditioning, has no significant effect on toe region transition strain, transition stress, or sensitivity to increasing strain.

Conclusions

There is a lack of standardisation in the mechanical testing of PT, which could have implications for the comparison of studies conducted using different protocols. However, variations in preconditioning regime have no effect on low-strain mechanical properties.