Abstract
Hemiarthroplasty (HA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) have both been well described as effective methods of management for displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly. THA has superior functional outcomes and lower long-term revision rates, while HA is associated with lower dislocation rates and faster operative times. While HA remains an appropriate management option in low-demand patients, it is commonly complicated by acetabular erosion. However, there is no consensus about the preferred method of treatment in self-sufficient, physically active patients with normal cognition. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of age in geriatric patients with acetabular wear after bipolar HA.
We retrospectively reviewed the records of all cases of femoral neck fractures treated with bipolar HA in our institution, during the period 2013 – 2020. According to the age at the time of fracture, patients were separated in 3 groups: Group A (age 70 – 75), group B (age 75 – 80) and group C (age > 80). Acetabular wear was defined as failure of the acetabulum, which needed revision to THA.
A total of 1410 patients (861 females and 549 males, mean age 77,2 years) were included in the study. 359 patients were included in Group A, 592 in Group B and 459 in Group C. Mean follow-up was 3.2 years. There were no significant differences in sex distribution, injury side, fracture pattern, BMI, ASA score, bipolar head diameter and leg length discrepancy among the 3 groups. The incidence of acetabular wear and need for revision to THA was 6.13%, 4.22% and 1.96% respectively (p = 0.009).
The higher rate of acetabular wear in patients less than 75 years suggests that THA is a more viable option for these patients. In group 75–80 years old decision for HA or THA should be made upon patient's activity status and biological age while above the age of 80 years old, Hemi seems to be the preferred solution.
