Abstract
To date there is no medical treatment alternative to surgery for osteolysis after THA. In this proof-of-concept clinical trial we examined the effect of a human monoclonal antibody against osteoclasts versus placebo on osteolytic lesion activity in patients undergoing revision surgery.
Patients scheduled for revision for symptomatic osteolysis were randomised (1:1) to receive either denosumab 60mg or placebo subcutaneously eight weeks prior to operation. At surgery, biopsies from the osteolytic membrane-bone interface were taken for histomorphometric analysis of osteoclast number. Secondary outcome measures included systemic bone turnover markers.
22 subjects completed the study (10 denosumab). The denosumab group had 83% (−63 to −97), P=0.011 fewer osteoclasts at osteolytic lesion sites, 87% lower osteoclast surface (−65 to −95, P=0.009), and 72% lower eroded surface (−35 to −93, P=0.020) versus the placebo group. At surgery, serum CTX-I, TRAP5b and PINP were 80% (−65 to −95, p<0.001), 57% (−40 to −90, p<0.001), and 44% (−41 to −65, p<0.001) lower in the denosumab versus placebo groups, respectively. The rate of adverse events (denosumab 6, placebo 7) were similar between groups (P>0.05).
These data provide a biological basis for a definitive clinical trial using pain, function and prosthesis survival as the study endpoints. As osteolysis/ aseptic loosening is the leading cause of prosthesis failure world-wide, the establishment of a non-surgical solution would reduce patient suffering and dramatically reducing the cost to healthcare economies.
