Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare oxinium versus metal-on-polyethylene wear in two consecutive prospective randomized series of low friction total hip arthroplasty at a minimum 10-year follow-up.
A total of 100 patients with a median age of 60.9 years were randomized to receive either oxinium (50 hips) or metal (50 hips) femoral head. The polyethylene socket was EtO sterilized in the first 50 patients, whereas it was highly cross-linked and remelted (XLPE) in the following 50 patients. The primary criterion for evaluation was linear head penetration measurement using the Martell system by an investigator blinded to the material. Also, a survivorship analysis was performed using wear related loosening revised or not as the end point.
Complete data were available for analysis in 40 hips at a median follow-up of 12.9 years (11 to 14), and in 36 hips at a median follow-up of 12.3 years (10 to 13) in the EtO sterilized and XLPE series, respectively.
In the EtO sterilized series, the mean steady-state wear rate was 0.245 ± 0.080 mm/year in the oxinium group versus 0.186 ± 0.062 mm/year in the metal group (p = 0.009). In the XLPE series, the mean steady-state wear rate was 0.037±0.016 mm/year in the oxinium group versus 0.036±0.015 mm/year in the metal group (p = 0.94). The survival rate at 10 years was 100% in both XLPE series, whereas it was 82.9% (IC 95%, 65–100) and 70.5% (IC95%, 50.1–90.9) in the metal-EtO and oxinium-EtO series, respectively.
This RCT demonstrated that up to 14-year follow-up, wear was significantly reduced when using XLPE, irrespective of the femoral head material. Also, no osteolysis related complication was observed in the XLPE series. In the current study, oxinium femoral heads showed no advantage over metal heads and therefore their continued used should be questioned related to their cost.
