Abstract
The influence of the surgical process on implant loosening and periprosthetic fractures (PPF) as major complications in uncemented total hip arthroplasty (THA) have rarely been studied due to the difficult quantification. Meanwhile registry analyses have clearly shown a decrease in complications with increasing experience. The goal of this study was to determine the extent of variability in THA stem implantation between highly experienced surgeons with respect to implant-size, -position, press-fit, contact area, primary stability and the effect of using a powered impaction tool.
Primary hip stems were implanted in 16 cadaveric femur pairs by three experienced surgeons using manual and powered impaction. Quantitative CTs were taken before and after each process step and stem tilt, canal-fill-ratio, pressfit and contact area between bone and implant determined. 11 femur pairs were additionally tested for primary stability under cyclic loading conditions.
Higher variations in press-fit and contact area between the surgeons for manual impactions compared to powered were observed. Stem tilt and implant sizing varied between surgeons but not between impaction methods. Larger stems exhibited less micromotion compared to smaller stems.
Larger implants may increase PPF risk, while smaller implants reduce primary stability. The reduced variation for powered impactions indicates that appropriate measures may promote a more standardized process. The observed variations between the experienced surgeons may represent the acceptable range for this specific stem design. Variability in the implantation process warrants further investigations since certain deviations e.g. a stem tilt towards varus, might increase bone stresses and PPF risk.
