header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

Research

ACUTE PAIN MANAGEMENT FOLLOWING ELECTIVE ORTHOPAEDIC SHOULDER SURGERY

The 29th Annual Meeting of the European Orthopaedic Research Society (EORS), Rome, Italy, 15–17 September 2021.



Abstract

Introduction and Objective

Postoperative pain control in shoulder surgery is challenging even in arthroscopic procedures. Acute postoperative pain can last up to 48hrs despite using multimodal analgesia. Different techniques have been used to control acute pain following shoulder surgery. The most common technique currently used in shoulder surgery at the elective orthopaedic centre in Leeds is a combination of general anaesthetic (GA) and interscalene block (ISB). ISB maybe very effective, however, carries many risks and potential side effects such as brachial plexus injury and paralysis of the vagus and laryngeal recurrent nerves as well as cervical sympathetic nerve and pneumothorax. ISB can also be associated with higher incidence of neurological deficit compared to other peripheral nerve blocks; up to 14% at 10 days in some cases. As such we decided to examine the use of ISB for achieving pain control in our elective unit.

Materials and Methods

A prospective consecutive series of 217 patients undergoing shoulder surgery were studied. These were grouped into 10 groups. All procedures were arthroscopic apart from shoulder arthroplasty procedures such as hemiarthroplasty and total shoulder replacements (TSRs). The choice of regional anaesthesia was ISB with GA as standard practice. Visual analogue scores (VAS) at 0hrs, 1hr, 2hrs, 4hrs and 6hrs; and total opiates intake were recorded. A one-way single factor ANOVA was used as preferred statistical analytical method to determine whether there is a difference in VAS scores and total opiates intake amongst the groups. Postoperative analgesics were used for pain relief, although these were not standardised.

Results

In total shoulder replacement group, although the RSR group used more morphine on average compared to the ASR group (Mean morphine intake 6.5mg vs 3mg), this was not statistically significant (F<Fcrit; p value= 0.19). When comparing all the arthroplasty groups, the difference in mean morphine intake was also statistically not significant (F<Fcrit; p value=0.24). However, when comparing all 10 groups’ morphine intake there was a statistically significant difference amongst these groups (F>F crit; p value=0.03). Interestingly, there was a statistically significant difference in VAS at 0hrs (F>Fcrit p value=0.01); 1hrs (F>Fcrit; p value=0.00), and at 6hrs (F>Fcrit; p value=0.02) when comparing all 10 groups.

Conclusions

ISB is an effective technique in achieving pain control in shoulder surgery; however, there are still variations in analgesic needs amongst groups and the use of alternative techniques should be thus explored. A future prospective study looking at acute pain for a longer period of time after shoulder surgery would explore the effectiveness of ISB in achieving pain control consistent with rehabilitation requirements.


Email: