header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

Research

INTRARATER RELIABILITY OF DIGITAL THERMOGRAPHY IN DETECTING PIN SITE INFECTION; A PROOF OF CONCEPT STUDY

The 29th Annual Meeting of the European Orthopaedic Research Society (EORS), Rome, Italy, 15–17 September 2021.



Abstract

Introduction and Objective

Digital infra-red thermography may have the capability of identifying local inflammations. Nevertheless, the role of thermography in diagnosing pin site infection has not been explored yet and the reliability and validity of this method for pin site surveillance is in question. The purpose of this study was to explore the capability and intra-rater reliability of thermography in detecting pin site infection.

Materials and Methods

This explorative proof of concept study follows GRRAS -guidelines for reporting reliability and agreement studies. After clinical assessment of pin sites by one examiner using Modified Gordon Pin Infection Classification (Grade 0 – 6), thermographic images of the pin sites were captured with a FLIR C3 camera and analyzed by the FLIR tools software package. The maximum skin temperature around the pin site and the maximum temperature for the whole thermographic picture was measured. Intra-rater agreement was established and test-retests were performed with different camera angles.

Results

Thirteen (4 females) patients (age 9–72 years) were included. Indications for frames: 4 fracture, 2 deformity correction, 1 lengthening, 6 bone transport. Days from surgery to thermography ranged from 27 to 385 days. Overall, 231 pin sites were included. Eleven pin sites were diagnosed with early signs of infection: five grade 1, five grade 2, one grade 3. Mean pin site temperature was 33.9 °C (29.0–35.4). With 34 °C as cut-off value for infection, sensitivity was 73%, specificity 67%, positive predictive value 10% and negative predictive value 98%. Intra-rater reliability for thermography was ICC 0.85 (0.77–0.92). The temperature measured was influenced by the camera postioning in relation to pin site with a variance of 0.2.

Conclusions

Measurements of pin sites using the handheld FLIR C3 infrared camera was a reliable method and the temperature was related to infection grading. This study demonstrates that digital thermography with a handheld camera might be used for monitoring the pin sites after operations to detect early infection, however, future larger prospective studies are necessary.


Email: