Abstract
Introduction and Objective
Gait variability is the amplitude of the fluctuations in the time series with respect to the mean of kinematic (e.g., joint angles) or kinetic (e.g., joint moments) measurements. Although gait variability increases with normal ageing or pathological mechanisms, such as knee osteoarthritis (OA). The purpose was to determine if a patient who underwent a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can reduce gait variability.
Materials and Methods
Twenty-five patients awaiting TKA were randomly assigned to receive either medial pivot (MP, m=7/f=6, age=62.4±6.2 years) or posterior stabilized (PS, m=7/f=5, age=63.7±8.9 years) implants, and were compared to 13 controls (CTRL, m=7/f=6, age=63.9±4.3 years). All patients completed a gait analysis within one month prior and 12 months following surgery, CTRLs completed the protocol once. A waveform F-Test Method (WFM) was used to compare the variance in knee biomechanics variables at each interval of the gait cycle.
Results
Preoperatively, the PS group had greater sagittal knee angle variability compared to the MP (32–58% gait cycle) and CTRL (21–53% gait cycle) groups. Postoperatively, no difference in sagittal knee angle variability existed between any of the groups. Preoperatively, sagittal knee moment variability was greater in the MP (2–39% gait cycle) and PS (5–19% and 42–57% gait cycle) groups compared to the CTRL. Postoperatively, sagittal knee moment was lower in the MP (49–55% gait cycle) and greater in the PS (23–36% gait cycle) compared to the CTRL. Knee power variability was greater preoperatively in the MP (52–61% gait cycle) and PS (52–62% gait cycle) compared to the CTRL. Postoperatively, knee power variability was lower in the MP (17–22% and 45–50% gait cycle) and PS (6–23%, 34–41% and 45–49% gait cycle) compared to the CTRL group.
Conclusions
Preoperatively, knee OA patients have greater variability in knee moments than CTRLs during the transition from double-limb support to single-limb support on the affected limb. This indicates knee instability as patients are adopting a gait strategy that refers to knee muscle contraction avoidance. The MP group showed greater knee stability postoperatively as they had lower knee moment and power variability compared to the CTRL. The significance of having less variability than CTRLs is not well understood at this time. Future research on muscle activity is needed to determine if neuromuscular adaptations are causing these reductions in variability after TKA.
