Abstract
Introduction and Objective
The osteocyte, recognized as a major orchestrator of osteoblast and osteoclast activity, is the most important key player during bone remodeling processes. Imbalances that occur during bone remodeling, caused by hormone perturbations or alterations in mechanical loading, can induce bone disease as osteoporosis. Due to limited understanding of the underlying mechanisms, current therapies for osteoporosis cannot adequately address this imbalance because current studies of osteocytes rely on conventional cell culture that cannot recapitulate local in vivo microenvironments for the lack of control of the spatial/temporal distribution of cells and biomolecules. Microfluidics is the science and technology of microscale fluid manipulating and sensing and can help fill this gap.
Materials and Methods
We used a microfluidic device to enable the culture of osteocyte-like cells (MLO-Y4 and MLO-A5) in a 3D fashion. Osteocytes were cultured in a perfused and 160 μm high channel and embedded in a bone-like extracellular matrix: osteocytes were embedded in a matrigel- and collagen-based hydrogel enriched with nanostructured hydroxypatite crystals (HA-NP) to mimic bone. To set up the best combination of matrigel enriched with Type I collagen we used fluorescent microspheres and confocal analysis. To evaluate the viability and the expression of osteocytic markers, we used live-dead assay amd immunofluorescent staining and confocal analysis combined with automated quantification. For mineralization, we performed alizarin red staining.
Results
Osteocytes in the organ-on-a-chip model showed high viability and, in respect to 2D conventional cell cultures an increased differentiation, as assessed by a live-dead assay and the staining of the osteocytic markers connexin-43 and alkaline phosphatase and the increased mineralization activity. Furthermore, the addition of HA-NP significantly increased the formation of dendrite-like structures spreading through the xyz-axes, as assessed after G-actin immunofluorescence.
Conclusions
Using a microfluidic device for MLO-Y4 and MLO-A5 cell cultures, compared to the 2D surfaces, we demonstrated a significant difference in cell differentiation and morphology. In particular, 3D cultures allowed the formation of 3D cell networks and the osteogenic phenotype. As a platform technology, this microfluidic device can function as a novel cell culture model that enables further studies of osteocytes and 3D co-culturing with other bone cells for the screening of anti-osteoporotic drugs.
