Abstract
Introduction and Objective
Plating of geriatric distal femoral fractures with Locking Compression Plate Distal Femur (LCP–DF) often requires augmentation with a supplemental medial plate to achieve sufficient stability allowing early mobilization. However, medial vital structures may be impaired by supplemental medial plating using a straight plate. Therefore, a helically shaped medial plate may be used to avoid damage of these structures. Aim of the current study was to investigate the biomechanical competence of augmented LCP–DF plating using a supplemental straight versus helically shaped medial plate.
Materials and Methods
Ten pairs of human cadaveric femora with poor bone quality were assigned pairwise for instrumentation using a lateral anatomical 15-hole LCP–DF combined with a medial 14-hole LCP, the latter being either straight or manually pre-contoured to a 90-degree helical shape. An unstable distal femoral fracture AO/OTA 33–A3 was simulated by means of osteotomies. All specimens were biomechanically tested under non-destructive quasi-static and destructive progressively increasing combined cyclic axial and torsional loading in internal rotation, with monitoring by means of optical motion tracking.
Results
Initial axial stiffness and torsional stiffness in internal and external rotation for straight double plating (548.1 ± 134.2 N/mm, 2.69 ± 0.52 Nm/° and 2.69 ± 0.50 Nm/°) was significantly higher versus helical double plating (442.9 ± 133.7 N/mm, 2.07 ± 0.32 Nm/° and 2.16 ± 0.22 Nm/°), p≤0.04. Initial interfragmentary axial displacement and flexural rotation under 500 N static loading were significantly smaller for straight plating (0.11 ± 0.14 mm and 0.21 ± 0.10°) versus helical plating (0.31 ± 0.14 mm and 0.68 ± 0.16°), p<0.01. However, initial varus deformation under this loading remained not significantly different between the two fixation methods (straight: 0.57 ± 0.23°, helical: 0.75 ± 0.34°), p=0.08. During dynamic loading, within the course of the first 4000 cycles the movements of the distal fragment in flexion were significantly bigger for helical over straight plating (1.03 ± 0.33° versus 0.40 ± 0.20°), p<0.01. However, no significant differences were observed between the two fixation methods in terms of varus, internal rotation, axial and shear displacements at the fracture site, and number of cycles to failure.
Conclusions
Augmented lateral plating of unstable distal femoral fractures with use of supplemental helically shaped medial plate was associated with more elastic bone-implant construct behavior under static and dynamic loading compared to straight double plating. Both fixation methods resulted in comparable number of cycles to failure. From a biomechanical perspective, the more elastic helical double plating may be considered as useful alternative to straight plating, potentially reducing stress risers at the distal bone-implant interface due to its ameliorated damping capacities.
