Abstract
Background
Partial facetectomies with pedicle screw instrumentation is widespread and a well described technique for achieving posterior correction of scoliosis. Newton et al. first described the use of the UBS in the posterior correction of AIS in 2014. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of the UBSPO in achieving posterior correction in Type1 AIS as compared to the traditional partial facetectomies. Aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of USBPO in achieving posterior correction in Type 1 AIS as compared to partial facetectomies.
Methods
A retrospective review of 40 patients with type 1 AIS who had undergone a posterior correction of scoliosis between 2010 and 2016 was performed. Group A (n=20) consisted of consecutive patients that had partial facetectomies while Group B (n=20) consisted of consecutive patients having UBSPO. Both groups were matched for demographic parameters. Pre and post-operative radiographic parameters and operative data in both groups were compared. The Mann-Whitney U test was used for statistical analysis.
Results
There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of age, sex, magnitude of curves, apical rotation and flexibility on the preop imaging. There was a significant difference between the mean postop Cobb angle (21.9° vs 9.8°, p<0.0005), correction (63.04% vs 84.3%, p<0.0005) and postop apical rotation (p = 0.008) in favour of the UBSPO group. At 2-year follow-up there was a statistically significant increase in the cobb angle in the facetectomy group (21.89° (immediate post op) Vs 24.64° P=0.033) and no such difference in the UBSPO group. There was no significant difference between surgical time (p = 0.536) and blood loss (p = 0.380).
Conclusion
The use of the UBSPO for posterior release provides more effective correction in the coronal and axial planes than traditional partial facetectomies in type 1 AIS.
