Abstract
INTRODUCTION
The increasing incidence of periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFF) after total hip arthroplasty presents growing concerns due to challenges in treatment and increased mortality. PFF are often observed when the prosthesis is implanted in varus, especially with blade-type stems. To help elucidate its impact on the PFF risk, the specific research question is: What is the effect of misalignment of a blade-type stem (resulting in down-sized prosthesis) on 1)the distribution and magnitude of cortical stresses and 2)implant-bone micromotion.
METHOD
We developed two finite element models consisting of an average female femur implanted within a generic blade-type stem prosthesis, (i)in neutral alignment, and (ii)oriented in 5° of varus, coupled with corresponding down-sizing of the prosthesis. Each model consisted of 1.1million elements, while the average mesh length at the implant-bone interface was 0.4mm. Elastic moduli of 15GPa(cortex), 150MPa(trabecular bone), and 121GPa(implant), and Poisson's ratio of 0.3 were assumed. The distal end was fixed and the interface was defined as a surface-to-surface contact with friction coefficients (dynamic 0.3; static 0.4). Walking and stair-climbing were simulated by loading the joint contact and muscle forces after scaling to the subjects’ body weight. The peak von Mises stress and the average stress within the surface having 1cm diameter and the center at where the peak stress occurred at each contacting area, the interfacial micromotion along medial, lateral side were analyzed. For statistical analysis, two-tailed t-test was performed between the neutral and varus cases over four loading cycles with significance level of p<0.05.
RESULTS
Neutral alignment led to three areas of cortical/implant contact with focal load transfer via those areas, whereas varus placement limited to two areas (Figure 1). In both simulations, the greatest stress was observed at the proximal medial contact. With varus, average and peak stresses increased by 39% and 65% during walking and 28% and 35% during stair-climbing, respectively (Table 1). Micromotion was greatest over the proximal third of the interface, especially along lateral side (Figure 2). The 90th percentile values with the varus exceeded the neutral by 35% with walking and 28% with stair-climbing over the lateral interface.
DISCUSSION
The proximal medial location of the greatest stress correlates well with clinical observations in PFF involving a posteromedial calcar fragment. Based on current lesser stress than the reported yield stress, loading during daily living activities may result in microdamage rather than an immediate PFF. However, impact loading such as hammering for stem insertion may introduce PFF at the location, especially with in varus. The increase in interfacial micromotion is expected to lead to increase in the risk for implant loosening, also leading to PFF. Further study is needed to confirm the validity and generalizability of these findings.
SIGNIFICANCE/CLINICAL RELEVANCE
This study demonstrates the importance of proper alignment of femoral stems of a blade-type design. The misalignment (resulting in down-sizing) increased stress up to 65% and micromotion up to 35% around prosthesis, even during daily activities, thus increased attention to proper implant alignment and sizing is suggested when using components of this design.
For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly.
