Abstract
Malreduction of the syndesmosis is a poor prognosticator following ankle fracture and has been documented in as many as 52% of patients following fracture fixation. The current standard for assessment of reduction of the syndesmosis is bilateral computed tomography (CT) scan of the ankle. Multiple radiographic parameters are utilized to define malreduction, however, there has been limited investigation into the accuracy of these measurements to differentiate malreduction from inherent anatomical asymmetry. The purpose of this study was to identify the prevalence of positive malreduction standards within the syndesmosis of native, uninjured ankles.
Bilateral lower extremity CT scans including ankles were screened. Studies were excluded if the patient was skeletally immature, had pathology below the knee or if they had congenital neuromuscular syndromes. The resulting cohort consisted of 207 patients. The indication for bilateral CT scan was femoral acetabular impingement in 110 patients (53%), rotation assessment following arthroplasty in 32 patients (15%), rotation assessment following femoral fracture in 30 patients (14%), rotational assessment for patellar instability in 30 patients (14%) and five miscellaneous indications (2%).
Fifty patients were reviewed by three observers independently and to determine inter-observer reliability. A single observer repeated the measurements within the same cohort four weeks later to evaluate intra-observer reliability. Three observers then measured the anterior syndesmotic distance, posterior syndesmotic distance, central syndesmotic distance, fibular rotation and sagittal fibular translation at 1cm from the distal tibial articular surface. Overall side to side variability between the left and right ankle were assessed. Previously studied malreduction standards were evaluated. These included: anterior to posterior syndesmotic distance > 2mm, central syndesmotic difference > 1.5mm, average syndesmotic distance > 2mm, fibular rotational difference > 10o and sagittal translational difference > 2mm.
The inter- and intra-observer reliability was good to excellent for anterior, posterior and central syndesmotic distance, and fibular rotation measurements. Sagittal fibular translation had an ICC of 0.583, and thus was only of fair reliability. Side to side comparison revealed statistically significant difference in only anterior syndesmotic difference (p=0.038). A difference of anterior to posterior syndesmotic distance of greater than 2mm was observed in 43 patients (20.2%). Thirty eight patients (17.8%) had a central syndesmotic difference of greater than 1.5mm. A fibular rotational difference of greater than 10o was observed in 49 patients (23%). The average difference between the anterior and posterior syndesmosis was greater than 2mm in 17 patients (8.2%). Nine patients (4.2%) had sagittal translation of greater than 2mm.
Eighty one patients (39%) demonstrated at least one parameter beyond previously set standards for malreduction. Only one parameters was anomalous in 54 patients (26%), 18 patients (8%) had two positive parameters, while eight patients (4%) had three. One patient was asymmetrical in all measured parameters.
In this study there was no statistically significant asymmetry between ankles. However, 39% of native syndesmoses would be classified as malreduced on CT scan using previously studied malreduction limits. Current radiographic parameters are not sufficient to differentiate mild inherent anatomical asymmetry from malreduction of the syndesmosis.
