header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

General Orthopaedics

A MECHANICAL COMPARISON OF A NOVEL SURGICAL IMPLANT WITH THE VOLAR LOCKING PLATE TO STABILIZE DISTAL RADIAL FRACTURES

The Canadian Orthopaedic Association (COA) and The International Combined Orthopaedic Research Societies (ICORS) Meeting, Montreal, Canada, June 2019.



Abstract

Distal radius fracture is one of the most common fractures in older women (∼70,000 cases annually in Canada). Treatment of this fracture has been shifting toward surgery (mainly volar locking plate (VLP) technology), which significantly enhances surgeon's ability to maintain correction. However, current surgical outcomes are far from perfect. There is a need for an implant which maintains the corrected position (reduction), minimizes soft tissue disruption, and is technically easy to perform. A novel internal, composite-based implant was designed to achieve these ends. It is unclear, however, whether this novel implant offers similar fracture fixation as the VLP. As such, the objective of this research was to evaluate the fracture stability (assessed by calculating change in fracture length) of the novel implant and VLP under cyclic fatigue loading.

Specimens: Seven radius specimens derived from older female cadavers (mean = 82.3 years, SD = 11.3 years) were used for the experiment.

Preparation: A standardized dorsal wedge was removed from the cortex. The distance from the proximal and distal transverse osteotomies was 10 mm and was positioned 20 mm proximal to the tip of the radial styloid. The osteotomy removed all load-bearing capabilities of bone, equivalent to a worst-case-scenario for DRF fixation.

Simulated Loading: The proximal end of the radii was potted (fixed) and positioned in a material testing system. To mimic natural loading conditions, hands were cycled between −30°/30° flexion/extension, at 0.5 Hz, for 2000 cycles, while tension load was applied to the tendons (25-N constant force per tendon, 100-N in total).

Mechanical testing outcomes: A position tracking sensor used to measure change in fracture length. This change, as a function of number of cycles, was used to assess implant resistance to fatigue loading.

Statistical Analysis: A paired student t-test was used to compare the change in fracture length. Level of significance was determined as 5% (p < 0.05).

Changes in fracture fracture-length for both the novel implant and plate is shown in Table 1. The paired t-test indicated significant differences between the two groups in terms of change in fracture length (p = 0.026).

The outcome of the novel implant ranged from very stable (change in fracture-length = 0.01 mm) to highly un-stable (2.88 mm). We believe the reason for this variance, at least in part, originates from the surgical procedures. Presumably, given that one very strong stabilization (0.01 mm) and one acceptable stabilization (0.37 mm) was obtained, future research directed towards surgical procedures may improve fracture stability.

For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly.


Email: